How to Select the Best Re-Ranking Model in RAG?

The success of RAG system depends on reranking model.
Re-rank

Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) has revolutionized the way we approach information retrieval and natural language processing tasks. A crucial component of RAG is the Re-Ranking model, which plays a vital role in improving the relevance and quality of retrieved information. In this article, we will dive deep into the process of selecting the right Re-Ranking model for your RAG system, ensuring optimal performance and accuracy.

Table of content

  1. Understanding RAG and Re-Ranking
  2. Factors to Consider When Selecting a Re-Ranking Model
  3. Popular Re-Ranking Models
  4. Steps to Select the Right Re-Ranking Model

Let’s start with understanding the relationship between Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) and Re-Ranking models.

Understanding RAG and Re-Ranking

Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) is a powerful technique that combines the strengths of retrieval-based and generative AI models. In RAG, a retrieval system first fetches relevant information from a knowledge base, which is then used to augment the input of a generative model. This process enhances the quality and accuracy of the generated output.

Re-Ranking is a crucial step in the RAG pipeline that occurs after the initial retrieval. It involves reassessing and reordering the retrieved documents or passages to ensure that the most relevant information is prioritized. This step is essential because it can significantly improve the quality of the input provided to the generative model, ultimately leading to better outputs.

Image Source

Re-Ranking is a process that takes place after the initial retrieval step in a Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) system. Here’s a breakdown of how it typically works:

  • Initial Retrieval: The RAG system first performs an initial retrieval, often using fast but less precise methods like BM25 or dense vector search.
  • This step returns a set of potentially relevant documents or passages from the knowledge base.
  • Re-Ranking Process: The reranker takes this initial set of retrieved documents and performs a more thorough analysis to determine their relevance and importance. It examines each document to the query or context more closely than the initial retrieval mechanism.
  • Scoring: The reranker assigns a new relevance score to each document. This score is typically more nuanced and accurate than the initial retrieval score.
  • Reordering: Based on these new scores, the documents are reordered.
  • The most relevant documents (according to the reranker) are moved to the top of the list.
  • Selection: Often, only the top N reranked documents are passed on to the next stage of the RAG pipeline.

Factors to Consider When Selecting a Re-Ranking Model

Relevance

  • This is perhaps the most critical factor. The Re-Ranking model should excel at identifying the most pertinent information for a given query or context.
  • Consider how well the model understands semantic relationships and contextual nuances in your domain.
  • Look for models that have demonstrated high performance on relevance metrics like NDCG or MAP in tasks similar to yours.

Efficiency

  • Evaluate the computational resources required by the model. This includes both processing time and memory usage.
  • Consider the trade-off between accuracy and speed. Some models might offer slightly better relevance but at a much higher computational cost.
  • Think about your system’s latency requirements. If you need near real-time responses, a lighter, faster model might be preferable.

Scalability

  • Assess how well the model performs as your dataset grows. Can it handle increasing volumes of data without significant performance degradation?
  • Consider if the model supports distributed processing for larger datasets.
  • Look into whether the model can be easily updated or retrained as your knowledge base expands.

Domain specificity

  • Determine if you need a model that’s pre-trained for your specific domain or if a general-purpose model would suffice.
  • Consider the availability of domain-specific training data if you plan to fine-tune the model.
  • Evaluate the model’s adaptability to your domain’s unique vocabulary or concepts.

Integration

  • Look at how easily the Re-Ranking model can be integrated into your existing RAG pipeline.
  • Consider compatibility with your current tech stack and infrastructure.
  • Assess the availability of APIs, libraries, or frameworks that support the model.

Interpretability

  • If understanding the reasoning behind rankings is important, consider models that offer explainability features.
  • Look for models that can provide relevance scores or highlight key passages that influenced the ranking.
  • This can be particularly important in applications where transparency is crucial, such as in healthcare or legal domains.

Customizability

  • Evaluate how flexible the model is in terms of adjusting to specific requirements.
  • Consider if you can fine-tune the model on your own data or modify its architecture if needed.
  • Look into whether the model allows for easy integration of custom features or scoring mechanisms.

Several Re-Ranking models have gained popularity in the AI community:

  • BERT-based models: Leveraging the power of BERT’s contextual understanding for Re-Ranking.
  • ColBERT: An efficient and effective model that uses late interaction for Re-Ranking.
  • MonoT5: A T5-based model that performs well on various Re-Ranking tasks.
  • LambdaMART: A learning-to-rank algorithm that optimizes for ranking metrics directly.
  • KNRM (Kernel-based Neural Ranking Model): A neural model that uses kernel pooling for ranking.

Steps to Select the Right Re-Ranking Model

Choosing the optimal re-ranking model is crucial for enhancing the performance of Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems in Large Language Models (LLMs). Re-ranking is a vital component that improves the order of retrieved documents to prioritize the most relevant ones.

Some key considerations when selecting a re-ranking model for RAG include:

Addressing Limitations of Embeddings

Embeddings used in the initial retrieval step often lack the necessary contrastive information and generalization capabilities to effectively distinguish between relevant and irrelevant documents. Re-rankers can surpass these limitations by employing more sophisticated matching methods.

Mitigating Hallucinations

Re-ranking helps address the issue of hallucinations, where unrelated retrieved documents are included in the output context. By rearranging the document order to prioritize the most relevant ones, re-rankers can improve the quality of the final response and reduce hallucinations.

Leveraging Cross-Encoders and Multi-Vector Models

Advanced re-ranking approaches, such as cross-encoders and multi-vector models, have shown promising results in enhancing retrieval precision. These models can better capture the semantic nuances between queries and documents.

Evaluating In-Domain and Out-of-Domain Performance

When testing re-ranking models, it’s important to assess their performance not only in the in-domain setting but also in the more challenging out-of-domain scenario, where generalization capabilities are crucial.

Iterative Experimentation and Observability

Debugging complexities in the RAG pipeline can hinder system improvements. By leveraging comprehensive observability across the entire pipeline and conducting iterative experiments with different re-rankers, AI teams can build production-ready systems.

Conclusion

The process of choosing the right Re-Ranking model involves carefully considering various factors, including relevance, efficiency, scalability, domain specificity, and integration capabilities. Popular models like BERT-based rerankers, ColBERT, MonoT5, and LambdaMART offer different strengths and trade-offs that must be evaluated in the context of your specific requirements.

References

  1. LLM-enhanced Re-Ranking
  2. Using LLM’s for Retrieval and Re-Ranking
Picture of Sourabh Mehta

Sourabh Mehta

The Chartered Data Scientist Designation

Achieve the highest distinction in the data science profession.

Elevate Your Team's AI Skills with our Proven Training Programs

Strengthen Critical AI Skills with Trusted Generative AI Training by Association of Data Scientists.

Our Accreditations

Get global recognition for AI skills

Chartered Data Scientist (CDS™)

The highest distinction in the data science profession. Not just earn a charter, but use it as a designation.

Certified Data Scientist - Associate Level

Global recognition of data science skills at the beginner level.

Certified Generative AI Engineer

An upskilling-linked certification initiative designed to recognize talent in generative AI and large language models

Join thousands of members and receive all benefits.

Become Our Member

We offer both Individual & Institutional Membership.

Subscribe to our Newsletter